Radiation Models¶
blastwave implements six synchrotron radiation models, selected via the model parameter. All models compute the specific intensity \(I_\nu\) at each point on the blast wave surface, which is then integrated over the equal arrival time surface (EATS) or forward-mapped grid to produce observer-frame flux densities.
Analytic synchrotron (sync)¶
The default model. Implements the Sari, Piran & Narayan (1998) piecewise power-law synchrotron spectrum.
Characteristic quantities:
Minimum electron Lorentz factor:
Cooling Lorentz factor:
Magnetic field from post-shock energy density:
where \(e_\mathrm{density}\) is the post-shock internal energy density.
Characteristic frequencies \(\nu_m\) and \(\nu_c\):
Peak spectral power:
Spectral segments:
The spectrum is divided at \(\nu_m\) and \(\nu_c\) into power-law segments. For slow cooling (\(\gamma_m < \gamma_c\)):
| Frequency range | Slope |
|---|---|
| \(\nu < \nu_m\) | \(\nu^{1/3}\) |
| \(\nu_m < \nu < \nu_c\) | \(\nu^{-(p-1)/2}\) |
| \(\nu > \nu_c\) | \(\nu^{-p/2}\) |
Fast cooling (\(\gamma_c < \gamma_m\)) swaps the roles of \(\nu_m\) and \(\nu_c\) with an intermediate \(\nu^{-1/2}\) segment.
Deep Newtonian phase (sync_dnp)¶
Identical to sync but handles the trans-relativistic regime where \(\gamma_m\) would drop below unity. When \(\gamma_m < 1\), clamps \(\gamma_m = 1\) and adjusts the spectral normalization. Use this for late-time afterglows or mildly relativistic blast waves.
Synchrotron self-absorption (sync_ssa)¶
Extends the sync model with self-absorption at low frequencies, essential for radio light curves.
Approach: Computes the self-absorption Lorentz factor \(\gamma_a\) by finding where the optically thin intensity equals the Rayleigh-Jeans blackbody limit:
where the effective temperature \(T_\mathrm{eff} \propto (\gamma_\mathrm{eff} - 1) \, m_e c^2 / 3\) corresponds to the electrons radiating at frequency \(\nu\).
The final intensity is:
This produces the characteristic self-absorbed radio spectrum: \(I_\nu \propto \nu^2\) below \(\nu_a\), transitioning to the optically thin power-law above.
The code handles six spectral regimes determined by the ordering of \(\gamma_a\), \(\gamma_m\), \(\gamma_c\), covering all slow/fast cooling configurations.
Synchrotron self-Compton (sync_ssc)¶
Adds inverse Compton (IC) scattering to the synchrotron model.
Thomson Y parameter:
where \(\eta_e\) is the radiative efficiency (depends on the cooling regime). The Y parameter modifies the cooling break:
The solver iterates (~100 steps) until \(\gamma_c\) and \(Y\) converge self-consistently.
Klein-Nishina corrections (ssc_kn=1 in P): When the scattered photon energy approaches \(m_e c^2\) in the electron rest frame, the Thomson cross-section must be replaced by the Klein-Nishina cross-section. The code computes piecewise power-law segments for \(Y(\gamma)\) with breaks at the KN transition Lorentz factors.
IC flux contribution: Approximated as \(Y_T \times\) synchrotron evaluated at the upscattered frequency \(\nu_\mathrm{IC} = \nu / (\frac{4}{3} \gamma_m^2)\).
flux = blastwave.FluxDensity_tophat(t, nu, P, model="sync_ssc")
# With Klein-Nishina corrections
P["ssc_kn"] = 1
flux = blastwave.FluxDensity_tophat(t, nu, P, model="sync_ssc")
Thermal synchrotron (sync_thermal)¶
Implements the Margalit & Quataert (2021, MQ21) thermal + non-thermal electron model. This is important for mildly relativistic shocks where a significant fraction of the post-shock electron energy remains in a thermal (Maxwellian) distribution rather than being accelerated into a power-law tail.
Dimensionless electron temperature:
where \(\varepsilon_T\) is the electron thermalization efficiency, solved via a quadratic to account for relativistic corrections.
Thermal emissivity (MQ21 Eq. 10): Uses the Mahadevan et al. (1996) fitting function \(I'(x)\) for the thermal synchrotron kernel, with a fast-cooling correction factor.
Non-thermal (power-law) emissivity (MQ21 Eq. 14): Standard power-law electrons with modified minimum Lorentz factor \(\gamma_m = 1 + a(\Theta) \cdot \Theta\) that depends on temperature, and energy fraction \(\delta = \varepsilon_e / \varepsilon_T\).
Self-absorption: Both thermal and power-law absorption coefficients are computed:
Parameters:
| Key | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
eps_T |
1.0 | Electron thermalization efficiency |
delta |
eps_e/eps_T |
Power-law energy fraction |
full_volume |
0 | Set to 1.0 for FM25 full-volume post-shock |
k |
0.0 | CSM density power-law index (for full-volume mode) |
Full-volume post-shock (Ferguson & Margalit 2025)¶
By default, sync_thermal uses a thin-shell approximation. The full_volume flag activates the FM25 extension where emission comes from the entire post-shock volume:
- Post-shock fluid Lorentz factor \(\Gamma_\mathrm{fluid}\) from Rankine-Hugoniot jump conditions
- Volume-integrated shell thickness \(dr = R \cdot (1 - \xi_\mathrm{shell})\)
- Downstream density and energy density rescaled for uniform post-shock conditions
This is important for trans-relativistic shocks (\(\beta\Gamma \sim 0.1\)--10) where the thin-shell approximation underpredicts optically thin flux by up to ~1 dex.
P = {**P, "eps_T": 1.0, "full_volume": 1.0, "k": 0.0}
flux = jet.FluxDensity(t, nu, P, model="sync_thermal")
Numeric electron distribution (numeric)¶
Uses a Chang-Cooper implicit finite-difference scheme to evolve the full electron energy distribution \(N(\gamma)\) and compute synchrotron emissivity + self-absorption from the numerical solution, rather than analytic approximations.
See Numeric Model for details.
Model comparison¶
| Model | SSA | IC | Thermal | Numeric | Speed | Use case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
sync |
Fastest | Standard GRB X-ray/optical | ||||
sync_dnp |
Fast | Late-time / trans-relativistic | ||||
sync_ssa |
Yes | Fast | Radio light curves | |||
sync_ssc |
Yes | Moderate | High-energy / IC-dominated | |||
sync_thermal |
Yes | Yes | Moderate | NS mergers, FBOTs, mildly relativistic | ||
numeric |
Yes | Yes | Slow | Non-standard distributions, pair production |
References¶
- Sari, R., Piran, T., & Narayan, R. (1998). ApJL, 497, L17.
- Wijers, R. A. M. J. & Galama, T. J. (1999). ApJ, 523, 177.
- Margalit, B. & Quataert, E. (2021). ApJ. arXiv:2111.00012
- Ferguson, R. & Margalit, B. (2025). arXiv:2509.16313 | GitHub
- Dermer, C. D. (2009). High Energy Radiation from Black Holes. Princeton.